Material is the largest cost on your job, and the least controlled. Invenire finds where it leaks across your suppliers, recovers it, and builds the system that keeps it closed.
Net margins on most trade work run single digits. A few points lost to overspend can erase the profit on a whole job.
Ordered job by job, from whichever branch is closest, at whatever price the counter quotes that day.
Spread across dozens of invoices and supply houses, the overspend never shows up as a line anyone can point to.
Most growing MEP contractors never built a purchasing function. It worked at $3M. At $15M it is quietly costing real money, and no one can point to where.
Committed costs live in a stack of POs and emails, not a system. By the time the numbers land, it's too late to act on them.
Without an agreement tied to your actual volume, every branch charges list, and your leverage goes unused.
Wire, conduit, and fittings bought across vendors with no tracking means identical items at wildly different rates.
No spend visibility means no scorecards, no accountability, and no idea which suppliers or jobs drain the margin.
Nearly nine years running procurement inside construction, healthcare, and public-sector operations, applied to your business at the scale you actually need.
Ninety days of material invoices, categorized and leveled. You get one page showing where the money goes, where the same item cost more than it should, and what a negotiated agreement would have saved.
Negotiated supplier pricing tied to your volume, bid leveling that compares quotes on equal terms, supplier scorecards, and cost tracking your team can run day to day.
For contractors who want it run without a full-time hire, I stay on as your part-time purchasing lead, holding vendors accountable and protecting margin as you grow.
In most trades, the business runs on thin margins and high material volume. That combination means purchasing is not a back-office detail. It is one of the largest levers on whether a job makes money, and usually the one no one is pulling.
Left alone, the leak compounds. Every job repeats the same unmanaged buying, so the loss is not a one-time hit. It is a percentage skimmed off everything you build, quarter after quarter.
Material and equipment run 50 to 60 percent of a project. Nothing else you control moves the number as much.
On single-digit margins, a few points lost to overspend can erase the profit on an entire job.
Spread across invoices, jobs, and supply houses, the leak is invisible from the inside. Unmanaged, it repeats on every job.
A dollar you stop overspending drops straight to the bottom line. No new work, no new crew, no new risk.
Send me ninety days of material invoices and I'll show you the gap on one page. If there's nothing to recover, you'll know. There is almost always something to recover.
Request your spend assessment →Invenire is led by Michelle Avila. The work is direct: go into a contractor's spend, find the gap, quantify it, and rebuild the purchasing system so the leak closes and stays closed. Not advice. A fixed problem and a structure the team runs after.
That experience was built inside real procurement operations across public-sector construction, healthcare, automotive, and education, categorizing spend, leveling bids, holding vendors to negotiated terms, and standing up systems that outlast the engagement. The same discipline that governs a public agency's purchasing, applied to a contractor moving serious material volume with no one owning the function.
Material and equipment run 50 to 60 percent of a project's cost. On single-digit margins, a few points of uncontrolled spend is the difference between a profitable job and a break-even one. It does not show up as one bad decision. It hides across dozens of invoices, jobs, and supply houses, which is exactly why an owner cannot see it from the inside.
Price variance on identical items is consistently the largest driver. The same box of fittings, bought across three branches in one quarter, at three different prices, with no agreement forcing the number down.
Every engagement starts by naming the leak precisely. These are the five that appear in almost every contractor that has never had a purchasing function.
| Ref | Source | What it costs you |
|---|---|---|
| A | Price variance | Identical material bought at different prices across branches and vendors, with nothing tracking the spread. |
| B | No volume agreement | Real purchasing volume left on the table because no negotiated pricing is tied to it. Every branch charges list. |
| C | Reactive ordering | Rush fees, expedite charges, and wrong quantities from buying job by job with no plan or lead-time control. |
| D | No spend visibility | No view of spend by vendor or by job means no scorecards, no accountability, no leverage at renewal. |
| E | Off-contract buying | Field and PM purchasing outside any agreement, invisible until the job closes and the cost is fixed. |
Roughly 90 days of material invoices, categorized and leveled. The output is one page showing exactly where the spend goes, where the same item cost more than it should, and what it is costing you not to have a system.
Negotiated supplier pricing tied to actual volume, bid leveling that compares quotes on equal terms, and the terms enforced. This is where the number moves.
Supplier scorecards, a preferred-vendor structure, and cost tracking the team runs day to day. The leak stays closed after the engagement ends, not just during it.
Send me roughly ninety days of material invoices and I'll show you exactly where your spend is leaking, on one page. No obligation, and nothing to prepare.
Email me to start →